@jgauffin wrote:
Are there a list with the callback URLs for oauth somewhere?
I just found the one for Google: Configuring Google login for Discourse
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@jgauffin wrote:
Are there a list with the callback URLs for oauth somewhere?
I just found the one for Google: Configuring Google login for Discourse
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@jkuehlin wrote:
Is there a page or an article on that explain the need-to-know basics of how to get my discourse forum to appear in search engines?
I’d be grateful for the direction, and any help. Just point, so I can research!
Thank you
Posts: 4
Participants: 3
@marguerite wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for being new here.
I’m a former phpbb3 forum owner and I decided to import phpbb3 to discourse.
The importer ran successfully. I even found a bug and it was fixed by our forum user, PR#5133 sent.
I did enable all 3 options about avatars in settings.yml
After the import, I immediately launch sidekiq, puma and nginx to preview my new forum.
And I noticed the avatars of my forum users imported are still lettered.
I thought I should see their old avatars from the old forum.
As the importer produced nothing wrong, I am confused.
Does it act like that because my sidekiq jobs are not finished?
Or there’s anything deeper?
I ran
avatars:refresh
andavatars:clean
but no luckThanks for any hint!
Marguerite
Posts: 7
Participants: 3
@CarsonWeitnauer wrote:
Hi,
As I am trying to understand the Discourse platform, I am wondering how customizable the new member process is. For instance:
*Can I require a new member to agree to Community Guidelines before completing the signup process?
*Can I require a new member to fill out, say, 10 fields before joining?
*Can I make forums public, read-only, when a visiting reader attempts to reply to a discussion, they are prompted to create an account; after they create the account, they are redirected back to the post they wanted to add a reply to?
*Can I customize the ‘help’ text that orients a new member to our site?gratefully,
Carson
Posts: 3
Participants: 3
@tobiaseigen wrote:
This is a very minor bug and you’d have to be bored and trying to break things to find it. If you choose a skin tone code beyond what is supported, it shows a missing image in the emoji picker in the composer, instead of just not working as it would with other emoji codes.
Replicated here on meta: t7:
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@J77J wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to install discourse on to a server I have up and running with a couple of other rails apps.
I’m looking to host it on a subfolder rather than a subdomain so I will likely use these instructions Subfolder support with Docker (I couldn’t find anything else that looked better/newer)
The instructions look a little out of date. Is this still the recommended way to do this?
Thanks,
Johnny
Posts: 5
Participants: 3
@kevinrobinson wrote:
Hello!
I’ve set up a fresh Discourse instance (private), and it’s working great as usual, except that /admin/upgrade hits a JS error that prevents anything on the page from loading. This is on v1.9.0.beta8 +41.
It looks to me like perhaps the loading order has changed. In poking around I found that some code related to this has recently changed, so perhaps these are relevant:
- Disable javascript for disabled plugins
- Do not load javascripts for disabled plugins by davidtaylorhq · Pull Request #5103 · discourse/discourse · GitHub
- Fix plugin JS for login_required by davidtaylorhq · Pull Request #5134 · discourse/discourse · GitHub
cc @David_Taylor since you’re involved in those and might have more context.
Thanks!
-Kevin
Posts: 6
Participants: 3
@notriddle wrote:
On desktop web, the page header switches from the logo to the icon paired with the topic’s name and categories. On mobile, it sticks with the header.
Wouldn’t mobile be the place you want the sticky topic title the most? You could hide the categories of it’s a space problem.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@lucatunes wrote:
Hello! I was wondering if there was a way that anyone can make a topic in a category but not be able to see other peoples topics in that category.
Hope that makes sence,
Luca
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@CarsonWeitnauer wrote:
Hi,
Most of the Discourse installations I have seen (so far) feature as their homepage either:
- A list of the latest topics in all categories (e.g., Meta)
- The left side is the categories; the right side is the topics (e.g., https://twittercommunity.com)
However, Codecademy Discuss features
Categories on the left side, with topics for each category on the right side.
Moving into any given category shows this repeated, down one level. Subcategories on the left, topics for each category on the right side, with all discussion topics at the bottom.Is the Codecademy layout a standard, built-in format for a Discourse installation? Or does this setup require a lot of custom work?
gratefully,
Carson
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@jj11909 wrote:
I am creating a custom banner that advises users how to use our forum. The built in banner feature is not powerful enough to do what I need (buttons, image rotation etc) so I am simply injecting custom items into #banner-content.
It works fine if I import bootstrap manually via CDN however doing so completely throws off all styling on the rest of the site. If I leave it out I can’t use rows or scaffolding.
Is bootstrap already included or am I missing something?!?!
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@trangchongcheng wrote:
I not found Adv Plugin in the Plugin tab .
I installed step by step of guide :GitHub - discourse/discourse-adplugin: Official Discourse Advertising Plugin. Install & Start Serving Ads on Your Discourse ForumThis is video i doing.
Please help me.
Posts: 9
Participants: 4
@Sujan wrote:
http://benediktmeurer.de/2017/09/07/restoring-for-in-peak-performance/
Besides just micro-benchmarks, it’s obviously also interesting to see direct real-world impact of such changes. Not a lot of websites are dominated by for…in peak performance in a way that it makes a real difference, but there’s one interesting example that seems to stand out: The time spent in V8 during page load of meta.discourse.org seems to drop by like 13% with these changes:
That will be neat…
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@tobiaseigen wrote:
I’m learning about staged users and am finding it not easy to identify staged users on my site so I can keep an eye on them and manage them. Would it be possible to have a filter on the menu to display only staged users, e.g. have
STAGED
on the admin user list menu linking to e.g. https://community.namati.org/admin/users/list/staged
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@tobiaseigen wrote:
I’ve been looking into staged users and want to be clear that staged users won’t be getting any extraneous or weird emails from discourse. Please reassure me!
Staged users (see screenshot below) appear to have email preferences set just like new users. This includes the Activity summary which by default would be delivered weekly and mentions and messages. Am I right in assuming that because staged users are staged and inactive that they won’t be getting emails?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@tobiaseigen wrote:
I did an export and am not entirely clear on which users are staged in the exported csv. The only difference between staged and active seems to be that the active field is FALSE and not TRUE, and of course the location and SSO provided info is blank.
It would be helpful to also export the STAGED field to csv export.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@hossj wrote:
I have recently setup Discourse and on top of that setup Mailgun as the email sending tool. This being said everything is done right in terms of DKIM, SPF, etc. I am even getting a 8.5/10 from http://www.mail-tester.com
However when I go to admin > email > settings and send out a test email to myself (Gmail) it goes directly to my Spam folder.
How can I prevent this from happening for myself and my customers?
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@pain wrote:
/admin/upgrade page blank was working before it had happened yesterday and then for some reason it’s now blank. seems to be a plugin, but everything was working all along
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@tophee wrote:
When discourse composes a summary email for a user, does it somehow consider which groups that user is a member of? If not, wouldn’t that be a nifty (optional) feature to improve the relevance of summary emails?
More specifically, the idea is that if user A is in the same group as users X, Y, and Z, A probably has something in common with X, Y, and Z. So if one or more among X, Y, and Z liked or responded to a topic, chances are that A will also find that topic interesting and it should therefore be included in the summary email for A. In other words, this would imply something like attaching a weight to likes based on group membership.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@jmsachs wrote:
Is there any way to easily display disk space usage (both text content and attachment)?
This would be a nice feature for admins to monitor disk space usage.
Posts: 3
Participants: 3