@hedgehog wrote:
I spent the whole day compiling a list of plugins, trying to figure out what they do and explaining it. I will keep updating the list.
Please help me by adding infos such as compatibility, new plugins etc. here or on the repository page!
If I find the time I'll also develop a real repository-page but I don't think that it's necessary at the moment as extensibility is still changing a lot in Discourse
Posts: 3
Participants: 3
@Erik_Manger wrote:
Hi,
Before I try to install Cloudflare - is it compatible? Is there anything from Cloudflare I should disable?
Posts: 7
Participants: 3
@avolve wrote:
Looking for someone to configure SSO for small non-profit community site.
Wordpress and Discourse are running, with Discourse set up as the comment engine.
I have had some issues with the Primetime Wordpress + Discoure SSO plugin generating a redirect look.
For example, the URL generated in Wordpress on logging in:
http://example.com/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/discourse.example.com/session/sso_login?sso= [STRING REMOVED]This is a very basic install of both systems, and will be used by a small community.
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@will_io wrote:
The Discourse Categories page lists categories like this out of the box:
Category | ■ Sub-Category ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | | ■ Sub-Category ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic |As someone who has many sub-categories I want to instead achieve this:
Category | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | By User | # of Replies | | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | By User | # of Replies | | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | By User | # of Replies | | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | By User | # of Replies | | ■ Sub-Category | Latest Topic | By User | # of Replies |So I intend to override
discovery/categories.hbsin the Admin Interface but the problem I run into is the model data is pretty limited. I am pretty sure I need to interact with each/c/<category-slug>/<sub-category-slug>.jsonto make this work.Suggestions? Following Discourse ideals and modularity makes this trivial task a little more difficult.
EDIT: After chatting with with @riking, he suggested a plugin is necessary for this to be efficient. Is there a plugin out there that has achieved something similar or at least something similar in theory?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@seagullmike wrote:
Is there an easy way to mount the forum under a context like /forum?
Posts: 3
Participants: 3
@Mohit_Gupta wrote:
I want everyone who has replied on a particular topic to get a notification email of my reply on that topic. Is this feature inbuilt or their is some special setting?
Posts: 8
Participants: 5
@sam wrote:
We have added tags in both search and topic lists.
Help us paint this bike shed!
Posts: 30
Participants: 13
@techAPJ wrote:
This seems like bad UX: there should be some indication that it's an album (if it is).
Also adding the title/description would be nice (if it has one).
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@fefrei wrote:
In some places, usernames are used as part of URLs, for example in
admin/users/<username>. Some usernames can therefore cause routing issues:
- Register a user
list.- Login as the administrator, go to the users list, open the details for this user.
- Notice that you are on
admin/users/list.- Reload the page. You get to the list of all users, since
admin/users/listactually matches this route.Many other URLs like
users/account-createdare safe, since-cannot be part of a username.Here, this is only a small annoyance. I'm not sure whether there are more interesting cases where a similar problem can be triggered, though.
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@gtanczyk wrote:
Site logo and icons do not play together well on small screen.
Expected:
- either scale logo or use the smaller oneImage:
Thanks!
Posts: 5
Participants: 3
@ndalliard wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to install my first plugin and used some Tab to insert the github url. I got an error after the
./launcher rebuild appcommand. I had to use and no Tab. Is that intended? If so you should mention this in the guide on how to install plugins. Or I am the only one who uses Tab?
Posts: 6
Participants: 2
@johnmuhl wrote:
Click a tag from the tags page; the header will be Tags > docker for example. Scroll down the list to a topic with a secondary tag and click that tag name. The URL changes to match the new tag and the list of topics changes but the page header still says Tags > docker.
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@potentialuse wrote:
I'm considering charging my users for creating an account on my Discourse website. How can I do that?
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@jeremyh wrote:
I am looking at the potential of using Discourse on an e-commerce site. I'd like to setup the ability to have some general discussions around on industry by the community, but also attach Discourse on a product-by-product basis for product Q&As.
One of the benefits, or so you hope, around having strong user generated content is the additional SEO value and authority given to your domain. If we were to go with the hosted version of Discourse, would we not have to use a subdomain (e.g.: discuss.ourdomain.com) and therefore loose any potential SEO value of having all this rich content?
Does anyone else see Q&A content as a potential SEO boost or does everyone just see it as an added user experience and user engagement boost?
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@fefrei wrote:
I'm running my Discourse installation behind an nginx proxy (in addition to the one in the container) that handles HTTPS and routes requests to either Discourse or Apache. I'm also a SSO user, and have enabled
login requiredas well asuse https.This is working fine: Discourse always uses https links, http requests are caught by nginx and redirected to HTTPS, and not-logged-in users are sent to the SSO provider.
But I have noticed an HTTP request in the round-trip: If a not-logged-in user visits the Discourse instance using HTTPS, Discourse initiates the login process by redirecting to
http://discourse/session/sso, nothttps://discourse/session/sso. This is understandable since Discourse never sees HTTPS anywhere, but I think this is a bug: Ifuse httpsis enabled, Discourse should never send clients to any HTTP URL (except for external links).
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@kyler wrote:
Hey, I'm trying to increase the max file upload size on my site. I edited my config file per the instructions here:
I rebuilt the app and then my discourse went down. So I removed the lines and rebooted the server. Back up now, but still now sure on how to do this.
Can someone tell me exactly what file to edit? I had Discourse.org install my forum on a Digital Ocean droplet, so everything is standard. Thanks!
Posts: 2
Participants: 2
@Killian_Hermann wrote:
I hope support is the right category for this.
I upgraded my site from 1.2 to 1.3 about a month ago and the thread list used to gray-highlight users' unread threads. Now that has been taken away, everyone has been trying to figure out the "new" rules for finding "new" threads because "new" in Discourse language only means "recently added" and "unread" has a remarkable set of conditions users need to synthesize to understand what the software is trying to tell them. My users are to the point where there are calls to roll back because people are missing entire, vital, discussions and I'm in no position to tell them to RTFM. I took a poll and universally they do not feel the Unread filter is reliable or accurate (even though it explains right there in the three bullet points that what they actually want that filter to do is not anything at all like what the filter does) and they viscerally say the highlighting design was perfect and far preferable.
How are others handling this with their sites? I can't believe I'm the only one to feel this backlash.
For me personally, it's a non-issue I didn't really notice because I'm on the site all the time, so I just naturally track and stay on top of what I am into. But the noise has not subsided a month later after trying to educate them. I decided to see for myself what this looks like for a user who doesn't log in regularly and logged in with a test account that hasn't been used in a few months. Wow is all I can say - the lack of coherent visual feedback is immediately apparent. Who would have thought such a simple visual cue would be so important.
![smile]( ":smile:")
Is there some way I can get the background highlighting back? I read a thread that there was some caching concerns between multiple devices which is why this feature was removed but I never saw that in .2 and I used my phone and PC all day long on the site without issue, but i recognize I am a sample size of 1. Nobody ever complained about it, at least not in my communities.
It is unclear to me what the path is ahead short of rolling back and waiting for a fix/plugin/new direction for Discourse.
I am a huge, huge fan of this project and particularly the co-founders, so I am prepared to go the distance to make it all work - can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks a bunch!!
Killian
Posts: 4
Participants: 2
@wangerin wrote:
I have a internal category where we want to ensure that alle users has set notification-level to Tracking or Watching.
And if not, we want to force the notification-level to Tracking (either by having a way to force it, or by pushing the setting via API.
Any hint on how that can be done?
/Henning
Posts: 3
Participants: 2
@Columbo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a moderator on c-plusplus.net, a site currently employing PhpBB version 2. Switching to a modern software is long overdue, and Discourse is a strong candidate. However, we're afraid that a migration might be impractical, as the package we're using is so incredibly outdated.
We are aware that a migration from PhpBB3 is (officially) supported. Is something similar available for the predecessor? Has it been attempted before? Are there known hassles? If someone could share their experiences, that'd be great.
Many thanks in advance!
Posts: 4
Participants: 4
